• Teacher Grant Evaluation Rubric
    5 – Meets Criteria Fully,     3 – Meets Criteria,      1 – Does Not Meet Criteria

    Description
    Difficult to understand, uses educational jargon - 1 pt.
    Somewhat clear, some questions unanswered - 3 pts.
    Clearly written, easily understood by layman, fully self-explanatory, clear connection between why the project is important & how the requested funding would help in executing the project - 5 pts.

    # of Students Benefitting
    One Classroom or one yr – 1 pt.
    Grade Level, cross-curric-ular – 3 pts.
    Building Wide, multiple yrs use – 5 pts.

    Objectives are clear and measurable
    Objectives/goals mentioned and not measurable – 1 pt.
    Objectives /goals outlined, but not measurable – 3 pts.
    Objectives/goals are clear and measurable – 5 pts.

    Objectives are tied to Comprehensive School Improvement Plan/Building Goals
    Brief Mention/Not specific – 1 pt.
    Good explanation, but not specific – 3 pts.
    Specific Building Goal/CSIP objective noted in grant & explanation is clear – 5 pts.

    Evaluation
    Little evidence of how project will be evaluated - 1 pt.
    Some explanation of evaluation, but not specific - 3 pts.
    Explanation of planned evaluation techniques clear, includes plan to report back to Foundation - 5 pts.

    Above & Beyond
    Not a new idea or expansion of current programs - 1 pt.
    Somewhat new, innovative - 3 pts.
    Unique, problem-solving, enhances education - 5 pts.

    Budget Provided
    Overall cost, no itemization – 1 pt.
    Some detail – 3 pts.
    Itemized budget provided – 5 pts.